github/ansible-later
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/thegeeklab/ansible-later.git synced 2024-11-15 01:30:40 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
10aaa8e7e3
ansible-later/env_27/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bandit/plugins/injection_shell.py

658 lines
24 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

fix pytest
2019-04-11 13:56:20 +00:00
# -*- coding:utf-8 -*-
#
# Copyright 2014 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
# a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
import ast
import re
import six
import bandit
from bandit.core import test_properties as test
# yuck, regex: starts with a windows drive letter (eg C:)
# or one of our path delimeter characters (/, \, .)
full_path_match = re.compile(r'^(?:[A-Za-z](?=\:)|[\\\/\.])')
def _evaluate_shell_call(context):
no_formatting = isinstance(context.node.args[0], ast.Str)
if no_formatting:
return bandit.LOW
else:
return bandit.HIGH
def gen_config(name):
if name == 'shell_injection':
return {
# Start a process using the subprocess module, or one of its
# wrappers.
'subprocess':
['subprocess.Popen',
'subprocess.call',
'subprocess.check_call',
'subprocess.check_output',
'subprocess.run'],
# Start a process with a function vulnerable to shell injection.
'shell':
['os.system',
'os.popen',
'os.popen2',
'os.popen3',
'os.popen4',
'popen2.popen2',
'popen2.popen3',
'popen2.popen4',
'popen2.Popen3',
'popen2.Popen4',
'commands.getoutput',
'commands.getstatusoutput'],
# Start a process with a function that is not vulnerable to shell
# injection.
'no_shell':
['os.execl',
'os.execle',
'os.execlp',
'os.execlpe',
'os.execv',
'os.execve',
'os.execvp',
'os.execvpe',
'os.spawnl',
'os.spawnle',
'os.spawnlp',
'os.spawnlpe',
'os.spawnv',
'os.spawnve',
'os.spawnvp',
'os.spawnvpe',
'os.startfile']
}
def has_shell(context):
keywords = context.node.keywords
result = False
if 'shell' in context.call_keywords:
for key in keywords:
if key.arg == 'shell':
val = key.value
if isinstance(val, ast.Num):
result = bool(val.n)
elif isinstance(val, ast.List):
result = bool(val.elts)
elif isinstance(val, ast.Dict):
result = bool(val.keys)
elif isinstance(val, ast.Name) and val.id in ['False', 'None']:
result = False
elif not six.PY2 and isinstance(val, ast.NameConstant):
result = val.value
else:
result = True
return result
@test.takes_config('shell_injection')
@test.checks('Call')
@test.test_id('B602')
def subprocess_popen_with_shell_equals_true(context, config):
"""**B602: Test for use of popen with shell equals true**
Python possesses many mechanisms to invoke an external executable. However,
doing so may present a security issue if appropriate care is not taken to
sanitize any user provided or variable input.
This plugin test is part of a family of tests built to check for process
spawning and warn appropriately. Specifically, this test looks for the
spawning of a subprocess using a command shell. This type of subprocess
invocation is dangerous as it is vulnerable to various shell injection
attacks. Great care should be taken to sanitize all input in order to
mitigate this risk. Calls of this type are identified by a parameter of
'shell=True' being given.
Additionally, this plugin scans the command string given and adjusts its
reported severity based on how it is presented. If the command string is a
simple static string containing no special shell characters, then the
resulting issue has low severity. If the string is static, but contains
shell formatting characters or wildcards, then the reported issue is
medium. Finally, if the string is computed using Python's string
manipulation or formatting operations, then the reported issue has high
severity. These severity levels reflect the likelihood that the code is
vulnerable to injection.
See also:
- :doc:`../plugins/linux_commands_wildcard_injection`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_without_shell_equals_true`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_no_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_a_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_partial_path`
**Config Options:**
This plugin test shares a configuration with others in the same family,
namely `shell_injection`. This configuration is divided up into three
sections, `subprocess`, `shell` and `no_shell`. They each list Python calls
that spawn subprocesses, invoke commands within a shell, or invoke commands
without a shell (by replacing the calling process) respectively.
This plugin specifically scans for methods listed in `subprocess` section
that have shell=True specified.
.. code-block:: yaml
shell_injection:
# Start a process using the subprocess module, or one of its
wrappers.
subprocess:
- subprocess.Popen
- subprocess.call
:Example:
.. code-block:: none
>> Issue: subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be
changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell
Severity: Low Confidence: High
Location: ./examples/subprocess_shell.py:21
20 subprocess.check_call(['/bin/ls', '-l'], shell=False)
21 subprocess.check_call('/bin/ls -l', shell=True)
22
>> Issue: call with shell=True contains special shell characters,
consider moving extra logic into Python code
Severity: Medium Confidence: High
Location: ./examples/subprocess_shell.py:26
25
26 subprocess.Popen('/bin/ls *', shell=True)
27 subprocess.Popen('/bin/ls %s' % ('something',), shell=True)
>> Issue: subprocess call with shell=True identified, security issue.
Severity: High Confidence: High
Location: ./examples/subprocess_shell.py:27
26 subprocess.Popen('/bin/ls *', shell=True)
27 subprocess.Popen('/bin/ls %s' % ('something',), shell=True)
28 subprocess.Popen('/bin/ls {}'.format('something'), shell=True)
.. seealso::
- https://security.openstack.org
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#frequently-used-arguments # noqa
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_use-subprocess-securely.html
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_avoid-shell-true.html
.. versionadded:: 0.9.0
"""
if config and context.call_function_name_qual in config['subprocess']:
if has_shell(context):
if len(context.call_args) > 0:
sev = _evaluate_shell_call(context)
if sev == bandit.LOW:
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.LOW,
confidence=bandit.HIGH,
text='subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but '
'may be changed in the future, consider '
'rewriting without shell',
lineno=context.get_lineno_for_call_arg('shell'),
)
else:
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.HIGH,
confidence=bandit.HIGH,
text='subprocess call with shell=True identified, '
'security issue.',
lineno=context.get_lineno_for_call_arg('shell'),
)
@test.takes_config('shell_injection')
@test.checks('Call')
@test.test_id('B603')
def subprocess_without_shell_equals_true(context, config):
"""**B603: Test for use of subprocess with shell equals true**
Python possesses many mechanisms to invoke an external executable. However,
doing so may present a security issue if appropriate care is not taken to
sanitize any user provided or variable input.
This plugin test is part of a family of tests built to check for process
spawning and warn appropriately. Specifically, this test looks for the
spawning of a subprocess without the use of a command shell. This type of
subprocess invocation is not vulnerable to shell injection attacks, but
care should still be taken to ensure validity of input.
Because this is a lesser issue than that described in
`subprocess_popen_with_shell_equals_true` a LOW severity warning is
reported.
See also:
- :doc:`../plugins/linux_commands_wildcard_injection`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_popen_with_shell_equals_true`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_no_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_a_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_partial_path`
**Config Options:**
This plugin test shares a configuration with others in the same family,
namely `shell_injection`. This configuration is divided up into three
sections, `subprocess`, `shell` and `no_shell`. They each list Python calls
that spawn subprocesses, invoke commands within a shell, or invoke commands
without a shell (by replacing the calling process) respectively.
This plugin specifically scans for methods listed in `subprocess` section
that have shell=False specified.
.. code-block:: yaml
shell_injection:
# Start a process using the subprocess module, or one of its
wrappers.
subprocess:
- subprocess.Popen
- subprocess.call
:Example:
.. code-block:: none
>> Issue: subprocess call - check for execution of untrusted input.
Severity: Low Confidence: High
Location: ./examples/subprocess_shell.py:23
22
23 subprocess.check_output(['/bin/ls', '-l'])
24
.. seealso::
- https://security.openstack.org
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#frequently-used-arguments # noqa
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_avoid-shell-true.html
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_use-subprocess-securely.html
.. versionadded:: 0.9.0
"""
if config and context.call_function_name_qual in config['subprocess']:
if not has_shell(context):
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.LOW,
confidence=bandit.HIGH,
text='subprocess call - check for execution of untrusted '
'input.',
lineno=context.get_lineno_for_call_arg('shell'),
)
@test.takes_config('shell_injection')
@test.checks('Call')
@test.test_id('B604')
def any_other_function_with_shell_equals_true(context, config):
"""**B604: Test for any function with shell equals true**
Python possesses many mechanisms to invoke an external executable. However,
doing so may present a security issue if appropriate care is not taken to
sanitize any user provided or variable input.
This plugin test is part of a family of tests built to check for process
spawning and warn appropriately. Specifically, this plugin test
interrogates method calls for the presence of a keyword parameter `shell`
equalling true. It is related to detection of shell injection issues and is
intended to catch custom wrappers to vulnerable methods that may have been
created.
See also:
- :doc:`../plugins/linux_commands_wildcard_injection`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_popen_with_shell_equals_true`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_without_shell_equals_true`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_no_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_a_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_partial_path`
**Config Options:**
This plugin test shares a configuration with others in the same family,
namely `shell_injection`. This configuration is divided up into three
sections, `subprocess`, `shell` and `no_shell`. They each list Python calls
that spawn subprocesses, invoke commands within a shell, or invoke commands
without a shell (by replacing the calling process) respectively.
Specifically, this plugin excludes those functions listed under the
subprocess section, these methods are tested in a separate specific test
plugin and this exclusion prevents duplicate issue reporting.
.. code-block:: yaml
shell_injection:
# Start a process using the subprocess module, or one of its
wrappers.
subprocess: [subprocess.Popen, subprocess.call,
subprocess.check_call, subprocess.check_output
execute_with_timeout]
:Example:
.. code-block:: none
>> Issue: Function call with shell=True parameter identified, possible
security issue.
Severity: Medium Confidence: High
Location: ./examples/subprocess_shell.py:9
8 pop('/bin/gcc --version', shell=True)
9 Popen('/bin/gcc --version', shell=True)
10
.. seealso::
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_avoid-shell-true.html
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_use-subprocess-securely.html # noqa
.. versionadded:: 0.9.0
"""
if config and context.call_function_name_qual not in config['subprocess']:
if has_shell(context):
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.MEDIUM,
confidence=bandit.LOW,
text='Function call with shell=True parameter identified, '
'possible security issue.',
lineno=context.get_lineno_for_call_arg('shell'),
)
@test.takes_config('shell_injection')
@test.checks('Call')
@test.test_id('B605')
def start_process_with_a_shell(context, config):
"""**B605: Test for starting a process with a shell**
Python possesses many mechanisms to invoke an external executable. However,
doing so may present a security issue if appropriate care is not taken to
sanitize any user provided or variable input.
This plugin test is part of a family of tests built to check for process
spawning and warn appropriately. Specifically, this test looks for the
spawning of a subprocess using a command shell. This type of subprocess
invocation is dangerous as it is vulnerable to various shell injection
attacks. Great care should be taken to sanitize all input in order to
mitigate this risk. Calls of this type are identified by the use of certain
commands which are known to use shells. Bandit will report a LOW
severity warning.
See also:
- :doc:`../plugins/linux_commands_wildcard_injection`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_without_shell_equals_true`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_no_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_partial_path`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_popen_with_shell_equals_true`
**Config Options:**
This plugin test shares a configuration with others in the same family,
namely `shell_injection`. This configuration is divided up into three
sections, `subprocess`, `shell` and `no_shell`. They each list Python calls
that spawn subprocesses, invoke commands within a shell, or invoke commands
without a shell (by replacing the calling process) respectively.
This plugin specifically scans for methods listed in `shell` section.
.. code-block:: yaml
shell_injection:
shell:
- os.system
- os.popen
- os.popen2
- os.popen3
- os.popen4
- popen2.popen2
- popen2.popen3
- popen2.popen4
- popen2.Popen3
- popen2.Popen4
- commands.getoutput
- commands.getstatusoutput
:Example:
.. code-block:: none
>> Issue: Starting a process with a shell: check for injection.
Severity: Low Confidence: Medium
Location: examples/os_system.py:3
2
3 os.system('/bin/echo hi')
.. seealso::
- https://security.openstack.org
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.html#os.system
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#frequently-used-arguments # noqa
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_use-subprocess-securely.html
.. versionadded:: 0.10.0
"""
if config and context.call_function_name_qual in config['shell']:
if len(context.call_args) > 0:
sev = _evaluate_shell_call(context)
if sev == bandit.LOW:
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.LOW,
confidence=bandit.HIGH,
text='Starting a process with a shell: '
'Seems safe, but may be changed in the future, '
'consider rewriting without shell'
)
else:
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.HIGH,
confidence=bandit.HIGH,
text='Starting a process with a shell, possible injection'
' detected, security issue.'
)
@test.takes_config('shell_injection')
@test.checks('Call')
@test.test_id('B606')
def start_process_with_no_shell(context, config):
"""**B606: Test for starting a process with no shell**
Python possesses many mechanisms to invoke an external executable. However,
doing so may present a security issue if appropriate care is not taken to
sanitize any user provided or variable input.
This plugin test is part of a family of tests built to check for process
spawning and warn appropriately. Specifically, this test looks for the
spawning of a subprocess in a way that doesn't use a shell. Although this
is generally safe, it maybe useful for penetration testing workflows to
track where external system calls are used. As such a LOW severity message
is generated.
See also:
- :doc:`../plugins/linux_commands_wildcard_injection`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_without_shell_equals_true`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_a_shell`
- :doc:`../plugins/start_process_with_partial_path`
- :doc:`../plugins/subprocess_popen_with_shell_equals_true`
**Config Options:**
This plugin test shares a configuration with others in the same family,
namely `shell_injection`. This configuration is divided up into three
sections, `subprocess`, `shell` and `no_shell`. They each list Python calls
that spawn subprocesses, invoke commands within a shell, or invoke commands
without a shell (by replacing the calling process) respectively.
This plugin specifically scans for methods listed in `no_shell` section.
.. code-block:: yaml
shell_injection:
no_shell:
- os.execl
- os.execle
- os.execlp
- os.execlpe
- os.execv
- os.execve
- os.execvp
- os.execvpe
- os.spawnl
- os.spawnle
- os.spawnlp
- os.spawnlpe
- os.spawnv
- os.spawnve
- os.spawnvp
- os.spawnvpe
- os.startfile
:Example:
.. code-block:: none
>> Issue: [start_process_with_no_shell] Starting a process without a
shell.
Severity: Low Confidence: Medium
Location: examples/os-spawn.py:8
7 os.spawnv(mode, path, args)
8 os.spawnve(mode, path, args, env)
9 os.spawnvp(mode, file, args)
.. seealso::
- https://security.openstack.org
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.html#os.system
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#frequently-used-arguments # noqa
- https://security.openstack.org/guidelines/dg_use-subprocess-securely.html
.. versionadded:: 0.10.0
"""
if config and context.call_function_name_qual in config['no_shell']:
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.LOW,
confidence=bandit.MEDIUM,
text='Starting a process without a shell.'
)
@test.takes_config('shell_injection')
@test.checks('Call')
@test.test_id('B607')
def start_process_with_partial_path(context, config):
"""**B607: Test for starting a process with a partial path**
Python possesses many mechanisms to invoke an external executable. If the
desired executable path is not fully qualified relative to the filesystem
root then this may present a potential security risk.
In POSIX environments, the `PATH` environment variable is used to specify a
set of standard locations that will be searched for the first matching
named executable. While convenient, this behavior may allow a malicious
actor to exert control over a system. If they are able to adjust the
contents of the `PATH` variable, or manipulate the file system, then a
bogus executable may be discovered in place of the desired one. This
executable will be invoked with the user privileges of the Python process
that spawned it, potentially a highly privileged user.
This test will scan the parameters of all configured Python methods,
looking for paths that do not start at the filesystem root, that is, do not
have a leading '/' character.
**Config Options:**
This plugin test shares a configuration with others in the same family,
namely `shell_injection`. This configuration is divided up into three
sections, `subprocess`, `shell` and `no_shell`. They each list Python calls
that spawn subprocesses, invoke commands within a shell, or invoke commands
without a shell (by replacing the calling process) respectively.
This test will scan parameters of all methods in all sections. Note that
methods are fully qualified and de-aliased prior to checking.
.. code-block:: yaml
shell_injection:
# Start a process using the subprocess module, or one of its
wrappers.
subprocess:
- subprocess.Popen
- subprocess.call
# Start a process with a function vulnerable to shell injection.
shell:
- os.system
- os.popen
- popen2.Popen3
- popen2.Popen4
- commands.getoutput
- commands.getstatusoutput
# Start a process with a function that is not vulnerable to shell
injection.
no_shell:
- os.execl
- os.execle
:Example:
.. code-block:: none
>> Issue: Starting a process with a partial executable path
Severity: Low Confidence: High
Location: ./examples/partial_path_process.py:3
2 from subprocess import Popen as pop
3 pop('gcc --version', shell=False)
.. seealso::
- https://security.openstack.org
- https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.html#process-management
.. versionadded:: 0.13.0
"""
if config and len(context.call_args):
if(context.call_function_name_qual in config['subprocess'] or
context.call_function_name_qual in config['shell'] or
context.call_function_name_qual in config['no_shell']):
node = context.node.args[0]
# some calls take an arg list, check the first part
if isinstance(node, ast.List):
node = node.elts[0]
# make sure the param is a string literal and not a var name
if isinstance(node, ast.Str) and not full_path_match.match(node.s):
return bandit.Issue(
severity=bandit.LOW,
confidence=bandit.HIGH,
text='Starting a process with a partial executable path'
)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink